History & development
Locational astrology predates its modern computerized maps. Continuum, which preserves Jim Lewis's legacy, credits him with making Astro*Carto*Graphy accessible through computer technology rather than inventing every form of location astrology. Relocation, astrocartography and local-space methods should remain distinguishable.
Mythology & symbolic world
Practitioners apply planetary themes to places and directions. A 'Venus line', for example, names a planetary-angular relationship in a map; its association with harmony or attraction is an interpretation, not a measured property of the city.
Provenance: where the rules come from
Relocation, angular world maps and Local Space are separate operations. The astronomy sources explain reference frames and horizon events; practitioner manuals specify how their software combines those coordinates with a locational reading. The calculation recipe below describes Astral Atlas’s implemented model. A feature documented by another program is not automatically available here.
How it is calculated
Choices that change the result: Here the world map uses a geometric altitude of 0° with no atmospheric refraction or parallax correction. Apparent equatorial coordinates include astronomical corrections; “apparent” does not mean that atmospheric refraction was added. Latitude sampling is 0.25° and the displayed range is −85° to +85°. Reported distance is to these sampled segments on a sphere. Changing tropical to Lahiri changes sign labels and the selected symbolic lens; it does not move these physical map lines.
Inspect your calculated data →Uses & use cases
- Compare the same chart instant across destinations with the map and a relocated chart.
- Distinguish an angular world-map line from a bearing measured around one local horizon.
- Inspect why a body has no rising or setting line at a high latitude before treating a gap as missing data.
- Compare Western and Jyotish planetary themes while keeping the modern locational technique explicitly identified.
Interpretation methods
Read the angular condition first
In World maps, select planets and AC, DC, MC or IC lines. Choose a destination, inspect the line label and distance, then read its planet-and-angle symbolism alongside the natal context. A meridian transit does not require the body to be overhead or visible.
For invented right ascension 100° and Greenwich sidereal angle 30°, the MC longitude is 70° east and IC 110° west. At the equator, the geometric AC and DC longitudes are 20° west and 160° east.
Compare a relocated chart
In Local Space & relocation, enter an origin and choose Calculate relocated chart. Keep the original UTC instant. Compare its Ascendant, Midheaven and the selected chart convention before adding an interpretation. Entering the same clock reading in the destination’s time zone would describe a different instant.
A destination can change local angles while the same-instant geocentric planet longitudes remain the same. This is an editorial comparison exercise, not a prediction about the destination.
Choose the Local Space origin rule
“Natal directions moved to this origin” carries the birthplace azimuths to a new origin. “Directions calculated at this origin” requires a fresh origin calculation and uses its own topocentric azimuth and altitude. Compare the destination bearing with the selected planet direction.
A displayed azimuth of 90° points east from the chosen origin. Moving that bearing and recalculating Venus’s local direction are different operations and can produce different lines.
Keep the interpretation in its declared context
Use the shared reading lens to choose planet meanings. In a Lahiri/Jyotish view, the map uses graha themes as a modern Atlas synthesis; it does not claim to implement a classical Jyotish relocation judgement. The geometric map still uses the same equatorial positions.
Switching zodiac labels can change the displayed sign or interpretation while leaving a Venus–MC line in the same place. A shifted sign label is not a shifted sky position.
Explore these reading approaches
Concepts in this tradition
Follow a term for its definition, word origin, evidence and connected ideas.
Disagreements & limits
- Map lines express geometry, not guaranteed experiences or measured influence strength.
- A body can be circumpolar or remain below the horizon at a particular location. A missing horizon line and a line clipped outside the displayed latitude range are different situations.
- The map’s zero-altitude convention is not a weather-corrected sunrise prediction or a model of terrain obstructions.
- The nearest displayed segment is an approximation; it is not an exact distance to an untruncated global curve or a universal astrological orb.
- Parans, extra aspect lines and a full automated relocation judgement are not implemented. A visual line crossing does not identify a paran by itself.
- Local Space retains negative true altitudes for below-horizon bodies. Azimuths within 0.01° of the zenith or nadir are omitted; a great-circle projection is not a planet’s path across Earth.
Sources & evidence
Practitioner sources describe their own systems. Historical and astronomical sources support different kinds of claims. Reading exercises are editorial teaching examples.
- Continuum and the Jim Lewis Slayden Foundation ↗original lineage and institutional account
- Skyfield: Positions — local horizon and atmospheric refraction ↗first-party astronomy documentation
- Skyfield: Almanac Computation — horizon events and meridian transits ↗first-party astronomy documentation
- Astro Gold: Astro Locality Maps — mapping method conventions ↗first-party practitioner software documentation