Astrology wiki

House membership, apparent motion, and stated solar separation can be calculated from declared chart conventions. Lilly-style judgments attach traditional testimony to selected circumstances, but no single score, priority order, or automatic yes/no verdict follows from these labels. Essential dignity concerns a planet's zodiacal placement; accidental dignity concerns the circumstances of this chart.

Given a stated house system, place, and time, a planet's house membership and its angular, succedent, or cadent category can be reproduced. This is not the same thing as mundane angularity in observational astronomy, which concerns an object's relation to a local horizon or meridian. Lilly-style claims about strength are traditional judgments from this chart circumstance; category membership alone does not establish a result or a universal ranking across schools.

A bound ruler is a result of placing an unrounded zodiacal degree in a named table's interval. Historical tables differ, so the interval convention and source must accompany the result; the label is not a measured property of a planet or evidence for a personal outcome.

A calculation can report the chosen Sun-planet separation. Whether that separation is called cazimi, whether it is exempted from combustion, and what it signifies are school-specific interpretive rules. Longitude proximity is not a direct test of optical visibility, physical distance, or a planet's causal power.

Two significators must apply to a collecting planet under the chosen rules, including any speed and reception conditions. Shared contacts in a chart are not enough to establish collection, and the pattern cannot prove that a third party will help.

The observable input is a Sun-planet separation in a declared coordinate convention. A method must also declare its boundaries and any cazimi exception before assigning combustion. The traditional reading of impairment is interpretive; it does not report that the body is physically burning, invisible in every observational circumstance, or unable to produce an outcome.

Opposition to an assigned domicile determines this label, not a physical injury to the planet. Its interpretation describes conventional testimony rather than proving harm, incompetence or a failed outcome.

This sign-rulership convention differs from numbered house placement. Lilly counts it as essential dignity, but favorable testimony within a tradition does not demonstrate a successful real-world outcome.

Specified tables assign dignity from zodiacal position. Alternative tables can produce different scores, so the source matters; these scores describe traditional suitability or standing, not measured force, moral worth or a person's intrinsic value.

The designation expresses an inherited evaluative rule, not physical height above the horizon. Its symbolic status cannot establish superior character or override the other conditions in a chart.

Within this use, a face follows a declared ten-degree zodiac partition and table. It is not the ordinary word for a human face, and it is not automatically the Egyptian stellar-decan system; shared names do not make their sources, stars, or interpretations interchangeable.

This condition requires checking all five essential dignities under the selected table, including the applicable day/night rule for triplicity. Absence of domicile or exaltation alone cannot prove peregrine; the historical category is not evidence of dishonesty, social exclusion, or a person’s worth.

An exact aspect is a calculable event, whereas fulfillment of a question is an interpretive conclusion. Applying motion must be followed through intervening changes; present proximity alone establishes neither future exactness nor the real-world outcome.

The condition follows a zodiacal table rather than a body’s downward motion or the autumn season. Its name does not establish moral failure or make an adverse judgment inevitable.

The arithmetic is reproducible once the orb table is declared. Lilly records alternative values; the resulting tolerance is a traditional selection rule rather than a measured radius of influence.

The question establishes who the querent is, and a traditional rule usually assigns the first house and its ruler. That role depends on the consultation context; it should not be inferred from an unrelated saved birth profile.

The matter being asked about determines its relevant house under the adopted horary rules. Different interpretations of the question can change the assignment, so the chosen topic and reasoning should be explicit before judging the planets.

The dignity holder receives the occupying planet under the selected rule. Mutual reception requires both directions; whether an aspect is additionally required, and how it contributes to perfection of a matter, are separate method questions. A positional hosting label alone cannot establish cooperation, contact, or completion.

A planet stands for a person or matter because the method assigns it that role. The same planet can signify different things in different questions; its identity alone is insufficient evidence for a personal claim.

The proposed link requires a faster planet to separate from one contact and apply to another under the adopted conditions. A static pair of aspects is insufficient; even a qualifying sequence supplies traditional testimony rather than proof of mediation.

This label can be calculated only after the source's solar-proximity range and priority between nearby categories are stated. It is a chart rule based on a coordinate separation. It should not be read as an observational visibility report: visibility also depends on sky brightness, altitude, atmosphere, magnitude, and observer conditions.