What you need
- At least two sets of birth data
- Consent
- A named comparison rule
A reading workflow
- Obtain consent and verify each person’s input data.
- Choose synastry, composite or another explicitly defined construction.
- Identify a few interactions and describe more than one possible expression.
- Compare with both people’s accounts and preserve disagreements.
Use cases
- Voluntary relationship reflection
- Learning the difference between relational chart methods
Where this approach stops
A second person’s birth data are required. The current birth report contains no relationship chart; geometry cannot establish consent, attraction, fidelity or a relationship’s future.
Sources behind the approach
- Human Design Dictionary ↗official practitioner glossary
- Swiss Ephemeris Programmer’s Manual ↗technical specification
The workflow is an educational synthesis. Its references establish context and conventions; they do not validate all possible readings.